"Over a
period of several years, I spent a considerable amount of time running through
extensive calculations from the EMB-145 performance manual. The results of this were compared with
observations and experiments I conducted while operating the EMB in a
commercial airline operation. The
following article is a compilation of these calculations, observations, and
generally known fuel savings principles that can be applied to the EMB-145
family of aircraft." -David Williams.
Saving fuel when oil prices are high is of great
importance. The first consideration is
often on-time performance; however, climbing out on profile and planning idle
descents will not increase flight time and may even improve it. In addition, Long Range Cruise will typically
add only 2-5 minutes to the ETA while saving hundreds of pounds of fuel. Below are all the aspects and phases of
flight in which proper planning can save fuel in the EMB-145 family of
aircraft. Using all of them can typically result in a fuel savings of about
10%.
Fuel Load Planning
Taking
extra fuel in the EMB-145 does little to increase the fuel burn. Unlike many other airplanes, the EMB-145 can
climb to 37,000 feet, its maximum operating altitude, without having to level
at a lower altitude until its weight allows a higher altitude. Increasing the fuel load by 1000 pounds will
increase the burn typically 50 pounds or less.
Cruise Altitude Planning
A full
performance FMS, such as the Honeywell unit, can be a very useful tool for
cruise altitude planning. I recommend
initializing the FMS at the prior to flight with estimated loads. Any changes to the loads will be immediately
recalculated, so there is no harm in initializing it before receiving the final
numbers. In addition, the proper flight
plan with the published and typical crossing restrictions should be
loaded. With this information, the
Honeywell FMS with full performance will give you fairly accurate fuel burn
estimations. You can check this
information against your numbers provided by the computer or dispatcher. In addition, you can then use the Performance
Init What-If function to locate a better cruise altitude or airspeed. This will be discussed in-depth later.
Single
Engine Taxi
For taxi times of
less than 30 minutes, the use of a single engine taxi will only save a small
amount of fuel. Since each engine burns
400 pounds per hour at idle, at best 200 pounds of fuel could be saved with a
single engine taxi lasting 30 minutes. If the APU is running during this time, that amount will be lowered to
150 pounds. In addition to this,
additional thrust is needed with one engine to taxi, further negating the
savings. For taxi times of less than 30
minutes, the use of a single engine taxi is somewhat negligible. For taxi times longer than 30 minutes, a
single engine taxi with the APU shut down may be considered. 20-30 pounds of fuel will be required for a
crossbleed start, and slightly less for an APU start.
Taxi
At idle, the EMB-145
puts out a fair amount of thrust. On concrete,
simply releasing the brakes will allow the aircraft to begin rolling and
accelerate to a reasonable taxi speed. On asphalt, additional thrust is often
required to begin taxi, but once the aircraft does begin to roll, idle thrust
should be adequate for taxi. Unless
required by ATC in situations like crossing an active runway (expedite), power
settings above idle should be avoided. Any additional thrust is wasted fuel out the tailpipe, which will
require more braking and will result in hotter brakes for take-off. Use of this procedure will easily save over
100 pounds of fuel for a typical 30-45 minute taxi at a major airport. And if there is a line for take-off, there is
simply no reason for rushing up to it. An anxious pilot and a patient pilot will take off at the same time, but
the patient pilot will have more fuel and cooler brakes.
Initial
Climb
Leaving acceleration
altitude, consideration for determining airspeed should first be given to
airspace and ATC requirements, such as 200 KIAS below 2500’ AGL in class C and
D airspace (CFR 91.117.b), or 250 KIAS in ATL for the RNAV departures. The next consideration should be the
direction of flight. If the aircraft is heading
in the direction of the departure corridor, the aircraft should be accelerated
to 240 knots. If the aircraft is heading
opposite of the departure corridor, a climb speed of 200 knots should be
maintained. A high speed climb opposite
of the route of flight wastes both time and fuel.
Cruise
Climb (out of 10,000’) The key to
saving fuel during this segment of the flight is climbing on a correct profile
into the twenties. The normal climb
schedule for the EMB-145 above 10,000’ is 270 knots and then transitioning to
.57 Mach. Generally speaking, this is
the optimal climb and will save about 200 pounds of fuel. Unless ATC requires otherwise, adherence to
this will provide the best fuel economy. There are a couple of exceptions to this rule. When climbing into a strong and increasing
headwind condition such as the jet stream or an otherwise strong prevailing
west wind, it is better to climb out at a higher speed. In this case, climbing out on the alternate
290/.65 profile will save several hundred pounds of fuel in addition to being a
few minutes quicker. From the mid twenties
on up, climbing at .65 Mach will save a marginal amount of fuel versus the .57
Mach climb profile. In addition, if the
temperatures in the thirties are below standard, the higher airspeeds may be
required to keep the total air temperature (TAT) above –45 degrees Celsius, so
the .57 Mach climb speed should be avoided above FL250. A pitch of 4 degrees nose up is an elegant
solution for flying a proper climb profile. It will maintain about 270 KIAS into the upper teens, then transition to
.57 Mach and maintain that until the low twenties, then accelerating to .65
Mach in the upper twenties and increasing to .68 Mach in the lower
thirties. With only small adjustments,
this is a stable, fuel efficient, and mostly effortless setting that can be
maintained up to FL370.
Cruise
As a general rule of thumb, cruising faster
in a headwind and slower in a tailwind will save fuel in jet aircraft. This also holds true for the EMB-145. Reference the Long Range Cruise speeds for
the altitude, temperature, and weight in the performance manual. The number given will be a good speed for a
tailwind or calm wind condition, and for a headwind, some speed should be
added. For altitudes above 30,000’ and
in strong headwind conditions, a LRC speed may be less fuel-efficient than a
normal cruise speed. Referencing the
Performance Init What-If function of the Honeywell FMS will provide a LRC speed
that considers winds. It will also
compare it against the normal high-speed cruise concerning time and fuel
required. You can also compare different
cruise altitudes with this function. (The Performance Init What-If is an outstanding function and is useful
for practically every flight) Slowing
even somewhat from a high-speed cruise will save a notable amount of fuel, and
270/.72 is a great compromise for time and economy. For best fuel economy, slow further to Long
Range Cruise, which basically is 250 KIAS for every altitude, and add 10-15
knots for every 50 knots of headwind component, as a general rule of
thumb. Any changes to the planned cruise
speed must be conferred to ATC (AIM 4-4-11.c).
High
Altitude Descent
Fuel economy is
best at higher altitudes. Higher
altitudes should be maintained as long as possible to avoid the higher fuel
burns at lower altitudes. If ATC gives a
descent instruction, the descent should be made as slow as possible. ATC expects jet aircraft to climb or descend
at the rate of at least 1000 feet per minute; therefore this figure should be
used during a normal descent clearance. In addition, the crew can request a “Pilot’s Discretion” to descend and
maintain altitude as long as possible.
Descent
Planning With A Crossing Restriction
Maintaining altitude as long as possible is key to good fuel
economy. The EMB-145 will descend out of
altitude with idle thrust at a rate of about 3000 feet per minute. This works out to about a 4.0 degree
glidepath in a no wind condition, slightly more in a headwind condition, and
slightly less in a tailwind condition. Once given the clearance to cross, the altitude and desired angle should
be entered into the FMS. (And if you are
uneasy about a steep angle, you may want to consider placing a point five miles
prior to the crossing restriction, making this your new crossing restriction,
and thus providing a five mile buffer.) Soon after entering this information into the FMS, a TOD carat will
appear on the flight plan course. This
is your Top Of Descent; the point the selected angle intersects with your
current altitude. On the Honeywell FMS,
six miles prior to this point, the FMS glidepath will appear automatically. Start a descent at this point of about 1000
FPM down (and report vacating the altitude per AIM 5-3-3.1.a). Shortly thereafter, the glidepath with come
alive, and you can select 3000 FPM down and retard the throttles to idle. Staying at or below this glidepath will
guarantee the crossing restriction. If a
speed restriction of 250 knots at the crossing point is also given, you should
be level 5 miles prior to the crossing in order to slow. In addition to flight idle descents being
more fuel efficient, they are also quicker. At max speed, the true airspeed of the EMB-145 at 25,000’ is about 460
knots, and at 10,000’ is about 380 knots. Starting a descent early not only increases fuel burn, but also slows
the airplane, and can add several minutes to ETA. A patient pilot who properly plans can arrive
several minutes sooner and with several hundred pounds more fuel.
Minimum Clean Speed The EMB-145
can fly at very low airspeeds without any flaps extended; typically this number
is between 150-170 knots, depending on the weight. This is, however, not always the most
fuel-efficient speed, as it can be behind the power curve. I have found that a pitch of 4 degrees nose
up is a good indication of the aircraft’s minimum clean speed (the speed for
this pitch will be between 180-200 knots depending on the weight). For slower speeds that require more than 4
degrees pitch up, Flaps 9 should be selected. For airspeeds higher than this, Flaps 9 will result in excess drag and
fuel burn.
Approach
Configuration
For best fuel
economy, the aircraft should be glided at idle thrust to the marker in a clean
or Flaps 9 configuration. Unless
required for ATC, icing conditions, or maintaining your company profile, carrying
power with the flaps and gear extended will needlessly increase your fuel burn.
Side
Note The power output versus the
fuel consumption in a piston engine is relatively linear. In turbojet engines, the relationship is
exponential. A turbojet engine is far
more efficient at high power settings than at low power settings. “Cracking the throttle” in a turbojet engine
will greatly increase the fuel flow with a negligible increase in thrust and
thus should be avoided.
Honeywell
FMS Performance Init What-If
This function is located on the second page of the Performance
menu. The standard initialization must
be done before using this function. When
selected, the pages will appear as they do in the standard initialization,
except all entries will be in a smaller font. Any changes made by the user will be in the normal larger size
font. The last page with the weights
will ask to initialize the What-If information. Selecting it will not change any of the settings from the standard
initialization. This is a parallel
program, and it will compare the results of the What-If with the results of the
standard inputs done in the regular initialization. The first page of the What-If performance
data will compare the ETA and the fuel required or remaining. The second page will list the speed for Long
Range Cruise, which again does consider wind in addition to weight, altitude,
and temperature. The Performance Init
What-If can safely be used anytime after the regular initialization has been
done.
By David Williams, former EMB-145 captain and currently furloughed major airline pilot.